First NAIA Women’s Cross Country Coaches Top 25 Rating - Cascade Collegiate Conference Skip To Main Content

Cascade Collegiate Conference

Cross Country Courtney Blumer, CCC Director of Communications

First NAIA Women’s Cross Country Coaches Top 25 Rating

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – The Cascade Collegiate Conference saw three teams ranked and one received votes in the first NAIA Women’s Cross Country Coaches Top 25 Rating of the 2024 season, released Thursday by the national office.
 
College of Idaho secured No. 6, followed by Southern Oregon University at No. 9 while Lewis-Clark State College landed at No. 14. Eastern Oregon University received votes.

2024 NAIA Women’s Cross Country Coaches’ Top 25 Poll – No. 1
RANK LAST TIME INSTITUTION [FIRST-PLACE VOTES] FINAL POINTS
1 2 Milligan (Tenn.) [8] 492
2 1 Saint Mary (Kan.) [4] 487
3 3 The Master's (Calif.) [3] 478
4 4 Taylor (Ind.) [4] 477
5 5 Cumberlands (Ky.) 444
6 6 College of Idaho 422
7 8 Montreat (N.C.) 400
8 7 Dordt (Iowa) 393
9 11 Southern Oregon 368
10 10 St. Francis (Ill.) 350
11 16 Grace (Ind.) 323
12 12 Embry-Riddle (Ariz.) 322
13 15 SCAD Savanah (Ga.) 294
14 14 Lewis-Clark State (Idaho) 285
15 9 Indiana Wesleyan 281
16 13 Huntington (Ind.) 243
17 17 Cornerstone (Mich.) 242
18 RV Kansas Wesleyan 196
19 RV Carroll (Mont.) 196
20 18 Olivet Nazarene (Ill.) 194
21 24 Aquinas (Mich.) 163
22 25 Mount Mercy (Iowa) 130
23 22 Rocky Mountain (Mont.) 122
24 NR SCAD Atlanta (Ga.) 104
25 20 Concordia (Neb.) 93
Dropped from Top 25: Montana Tech, Benedictine (Kan.), Missouri Baptist
 
Receiving Votes: Montana Tech 68, Marian (Ind.) 65, Oklahoma City 64, Eastern Oregon 37, Doane (Neb.) 36, Saint Mary (Neb.) 20, Benedictine (Kan.) 19, Campbellsville (Ky.) 13, Cumberland (Tenn.) 11, Missouri Baptist 10, William Woods (Mo.) 5, Dalton (Ga.) 4, Mount Vernon Nazarene (Ohio) 3, UC Merced (Calif.) 3, St. Francis (Ind.) 2
 
Rating Methodology:
  • The rating is rated by a panel of head coaches representing each of the conferences and unaffiliated groupings.
  • The Top 25 is determined by a points system based on how each rater rates the best teams. A team receives 30 points for each first-place vote, 29 for second-place, 28 for third-place and so on through the list.
  • The highest and lowest ratings for each team (a non-rating is considered a low rating) are removed. The team’s rating will be recalculated with an additional point added to each team for every ballot (including discounted ballots) that the team appears on.
  • Teams that receive only one point in the ballot are not considered “receiving votes”.

Sponsors