2025 NAIA Softball Netting Professionals Coaches Top 25 Poll – No. 4 - Cascade Collegiate Conference Skip To Main Content

Cascade Collegiate Conference

Softball Courtney Blumer, CCC Director of Communications

2025 NAIA Softball Netting Professionals Coaches Top 25 Poll – No. 4

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – The Cascade Collegiate Conference saw four teams remain ranked in the latest NAIA Softball Coaches Top 25 Poll, released Wednesday by the national office.
 
Southern Oregon University and Oregon Tech continue to hold the top spots, respectively. Eastern Oregon University dropped to No. 13 while College of Idaho fell to the No. 23 spot.
 
RANK LAST TIME INSTITUTION [FIRST-PLACE VOTES] RECORD FINAL POINTS
1 1 Southern Oregon [16] 38-4 478
2 2 Oregon Tech 34-6 459
3 3 Science and Arts (Okla.) [2] 33-7 444
3 4 Cumberlands (Ky.) 32-6 444
5 10 Our Lady of the Lake (Texas) 39-7 412
6 5 Oklahoma City 33-7 388
7 7 Northwestern (Iowa) 35-6 373
8 6 LSU Alexandria (La.) 35-5 367
9 8 Georgia Gwinnett 33-8 363
10 9 Central Methodist (Mo.) 32-6 344
11 11 Madonna (Mich.) 31-6 308
12 13 Indiana Wesleyan 31-5 295
13 11 Eastern Oregon 23-6 280
14 14 Marian (Ind.) 31-6 275
15 16 St. Thomas (Fla.) 40-4 259
16 17 Southeastern (Fla.) 33-6 221
17 19 Saint Xavier (Ill.) 27-6 210
18 18 Hope International (Calif.) 33-9 206
19 15 Missouri Baptist 33-6 205
20 23 Middle Georgia State 28-8 201
21 21 Evangel (Mo.) 31-7 159
22 22 Midland (Neb.) 30-11 135
23 20 College of Idaho 25-9 122
24 23 Texas A&M  Texarkana 34-8 119
25 RV Grand View (Iowa) 24-12 71
Dropped from Top 25: Campbellsville (Ky.)

Receiving Votes: Campbellsville (Ky.) 60, Mobile (Ala.) 53, Rio Grande (Ohio) 44, Embry-Riddle (Ariz.) 25, Benedictine (Kan.) 24, Columbia (Mo.) 18, Friends (Kan.) 18, Jamestown (N.D.) 16, Keiser (Fla.) 8, William Carey (Miss.) 8, Dickinson State (N.D.) 3, Thomas (Ga.) 2

Rating Methodology:
  • The rating is rated by a panel of head coaches representing each of the conference/Continental Athletic Conference (Independents).
  • The Top 25 is determined by a points system based on how each rater rates the best teams. A team receives 30 points for each first-place vote, 29 for second-place, 28 for third-place and so on through the list.
  • The highest and lowest ratings for each team (a non-rating is considered a low rating) are removed. The team’s rating will be recalculated with an additional point added to each team for every ballot (including discounted ballots) that the team appears on.
  • Teams that receive only one point on the ballot are not considered "receiving votes".

Sponsors